DecisionMind Mühürlü, doğrulanabilir reprodüksiyon

Kullanım alanları

P-MARCOS

P-MARCOS - P-MARCOS yönteminin Plithogenic uzantısı

Plithogenic üstünlük/sıralama - Plitojenik Küme (PltK: çelişki dereceleriyle nitelik değerleri)

Formül adımları

Analiz motorunun yöntem bildirimindeki (manifest F.steps) adımlar; raporlardaki formüllerle aynı kaynaktır.

  1. Contradiction adjustment; cost complement.

    p^ij=(T+c(1−T),I(1−c),F(1−c));cost: complement first
    LaTeX \hat{p}_{ij}=(T+c(1-T),I(1-c),F(1-c));\;\text{cost: complement first}
  2. Anti-Ideal AAI (min T, max I, max F) and Ideal AI (max T, min I, min F).

    AAIj=(miniT^ij,maxiI^ij,maxiF^ij);AIj=(maxiT^ij,miniI^ij,miniF^ij)
    LaTeX \mathrm{AAI}_j=(\min_i\hat{T}_{ij},\max_i\hat{I}_{ij},\max_i\hat{F}_{ij});\quad\mathrm{AI}_j=(\max_i\hat{T}_{ij},\min_i\hat{I}_{ij},\min_i\hat{F}_{ij})
  3. Normalise using AI; PNWA aggregate per row.

    n^ij=(T^ij/TAI,j,I^ij/IAI,j,F^ij/FAI,j) clipped;S~i=⨁j(wj·n^ij);Si=s(S~i)
    LaTeX \hat{n}_{ij}=(\hat{T}_{ij}/T_{\mathrm{AI},j},\hat{I}_{ij}/I_{\mathrm{AI},j},\hat{F}_{ij}/F_{\mathrm{AI},j})\text{ clipped};\;\tilde{S}_i=\bigoplus_j(w_j\cdot\hat{n}_{ij});\;S_i=s(\tilde{S}_i)
  4. Utility degrees K± relative to AI and AAI.

    Ki−=Si/SAAI;Ki+=Si/SAI
    LaTeX K_i^-=S_i/S_{\mathrm{AAI}};\quad K_i^+=S_i/S_{\mathrm{AI}}
  5. f(K_i) function value using individual utility functions.

    f(Ki+)=Ki−/(Ki−+Ki+);f(Ki−)=Ki+/(Ki−+Ki+)
    LaTeX f(K_i^+)=K_i^-/(K_i^-+K_i^+);\quad f(K_i^-)=K_i^+/(K_i^-+K_i^+)
  6. Composite utility function f(K_i).

    f(Ki)=Ki++Ki−1+1−f(Ki+)f(Ki+)+1−f(Ki−)f(Ki−)
    LaTeX f(K_i)=\frac{K_i^++K_i^-}{1+\frac{1-f(K_i^+)}{f(K_i^+)}+\frac{1-f(K_i^-)}{f(K_i^-)}}
  7. Rank descending by f(K_i).

    rank descending by f(Ki)
    LaTeX \text{rank descending by }f(K_i)

Yöntem ayrıntıları kaynak kütüphanedeki özgün (İngilizce) metindir.

Sezgi

Sonucu okuma: p-marcos extends P-MARCOS to handle Plithogenic uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Plithogenic Set (PltS: attribute values with contradiction degrees) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via dominant value defuzzification; approach varies by appurtenance function before ranking.

Varsayımlar

  • Decision matrix entries are valid Plithogenic numbers/tuples
  • Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
  • All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale

Ne zaman kullanılmaz

  • Classical data sufficient - use base MARCOS directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
  • Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous

Sık yapılan hatalar

  • Değer-uzayı ihlali: hesaplamadan önce tüm girişlerin Plithogenic: each attribute has a set of values V with appurtenance degrees and contradiction degrees c(v,D) koşulunu sağladığından emin olun.
  • Defuzzifikasyon yöntemi sıralamayı etkiler: dominant value defuzzification; approach varies by appurtenance function kanonik seçimdir.