N-VIKOR
N-VIKOR - VIKOR yönteminin Neutrosophic uzantısı
Neutrosophic üstünlük/sıralama - Tek Değerli Nötrosofik Küme (SVNS: T, I, F)
Formül adımları
Analiz motorunun yöntem bildirimindeki (manifest F.steps) adımlar; raporlardaki formüllerle aynı kaynaktır.
-
SVN decision matrix; cost complement.
LaTeX
\mathbf{D}=(\langle T_{ij},I_{ij},F_{ij}\rangle)_{m\times n};\quad\text{cost: }\langle F_{ij},1-I_{ij},T_{ij}\rangle -
Best and worst SVN values per criterion.
LaTeX
\tilde{f}_j^*=\langle\max_i T_{ij},\min_i I_{ij},\min_i F_{ij}\rangle;\quad\tilde{f}_j^-=\langle\min_i T_{ij},\max_i I_{ij},\max_i F_{ij}\rangle -
Normalised neutrosophic gap ratio.
LaTeX
d(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)=\sqrt{\tfrac{(T_1-T_2)^2+(I_1-I_2)^2+(F_1-F_2)^2}{3}};\quad f_{ij}=\frac{d(\tilde{f}_j^*,\tilde{a}_{ij})}{d(\tilde{f}_j^*,\tilde{f}_j^-)} -
Utility S_i and regret R_i measures.
LaTeX
S_i=\sum_{j=1}^n w_j f_{ij};\quad R_i=\max_j\;w_j f_{ij} -
Compromise index Q_i; rank ascending. Check acceptability conditions.
LaTeX
Q_i=v\frac{S_i-S^*}{S^--S^*}+(1-v)\frac{R_i-R^*}{R^--R^*},\;v=0.5;\quad\text{rank ascending by }Q_i;\quad \mathcal{C}=\{A^{(1)}\}\text{ if C1 and C2; }\{A^{(1)},A^{(2)}\}\text{ if only C2 fails; otherwise include ordered }A^{(k)}\text{ while }Q(A^{(k)})-Q(A^{(1)})<DQ
Yöntem ayrıntıları kaynak kütüphanedeki özgün (İngilizce) metindir.
Sezgi
Neutrosophic outranking/ranking - Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3). Output typically utility (higher value = preferred).
Sonucu okuma: n-vikor extends VIKOR to handle Neutrosophic uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 before ranking.
Varsayımlar
- Decision matrix entries are valid Single-Valued Neutrosophic numbers/tuples
- Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Ne zaman kullanılmaz
- Classical data sufficient - use base VIKOR directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
- Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous
Sınırlılıklar
- Rank reversal known on alternative-set changes (ref: inherited from crisp base; cf. Belton-Gear 1983, Wang-Luo 2009)
- Assumes: Decision matrix entries are valid Single-Valued Neutrosophic numbers/tuples
- Assumes: Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- Assumes: All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Sık yapılan hatalar
- Değer-uzayı ihlali: hesaplamadan önce tüm girişlerin SVNS: T,I,F ∈ [0,1]; 0 ≤ T+I+F ≤ 3 koşulunu sağladığından emin olun.
- Defuzzifikasyon yöntemi sıralamayı etkiler: score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 kanonik seçimdir.
Hesap adımları ve dayanakları
-
SVN decision matrix; cost complement.
Dayanak: Bausys & Zavadskas 2015, Sec.2
-
Best and worst SVN values per criterion.
Dayanak: Bausys & Zavadskas 2015, Sec.2 Step2
-
Normalised neutrosophic gap ratio.
Dayanak: Bausys & Zavadskas 2015, Sec.2 Step3
-
Utility S_i and regret R_i measures.
Dayanak: Bausys & Zavadskas 2015, Sec.2 Step4
-
Compromise index Q_i; rank ascending. Check acceptability conditions.
Dayanak: Bausys & Zavadskas 2015, Sec.2 Step5