DecisionMind Mühürlü, doğrulanabilir reprodüksiyon

Kullanım alanları

N-VIKOR

N-VIKOR - VIKOR yönteminin Neutrosophic uzantısı

Neutrosophic üstünlük/sıralama - Tek Değerli Nötrosofik Küme (SVNS: T, I, F)

Formül adımları

Analiz motorunun yöntem bildirimindeki (manifest F.steps) adımlar; raporlardaki formüllerle aynı kaynaktır.

  1. SVN decision matrix; cost complement.

    𝐃=(⟨Tij,Iij,Fij⟩)m×n;cost: ⟨Fij,1−Iij,Tij⟩
    LaTeX \mathbf{D}=(\langle T_{ij},I_{ij},F_{ij}\rangle)_{m\times n};\quad\text{cost: }\langle F_{ij},1-I_{ij},T_{ij}\rangle
  2. Best and worst SVN values per criterion.

    f~j*=⟨maxiTij,miniIij,miniFij⟩;f~j−=⟨miniTij,maxiIij,maxiFij⟩
    LaTeX \tilde{f}_j^*=\langle\max_i T_{ij},\min_i I_{ij},\min_i F_{ij}\rangle;\quad\tilde{f}_j^-=\langle\min_i T_{ij},\max_i I_{ij},\max_i F_{ij}\rangle
  3. Normalised neutrosophic gap ratio.

    d(α1,α2)=(T1−T2)2+(I1−I2)2+(F1−F2)23;fij=d(f~j*,a~ij)d(f~j*,f~j−)
    LaTeX d(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)=\sqrt{\tfrac{(T_1-T_2)^2+(I_1-I_2)^2+(F_1-F_2)^2}{3}};\quad f_{ij}=\frac{d(\tilde{f}_j^*,\tilde{a}_{ij})}{d(\tilde{f}_j^*,\tilde{f}_j^-)}
  4. Utility S_i and regret R_i measures.

    Si=∑j=1nwjfij;Ri=maxjwjfij
    LaTeX S_i=\sum_{j=1}^n w_j f_{ij};\quad R_i=\max_j\;w_j f_{ij}
  5. Compromise index Q_i; rank ascending. Check acceptability conditions.

    Qi=vSi−S*S−−S*+(1−v)Ri−R*R−−R*,v=0.5;rank ascending by Qi;𝒞={A(1)} if C1 and C2; {A(1),A(2)} if only C2 fails; otherwise include ordered A(k) while Q(A(k))−Q(A(1))<DQ
    LaTeX Q_i=v\frac{S_i-S^*}{S^--S^*}+(1-v)\frac{R_i-R^*}{R^--R^*},\;v=0.5;\quad\text{rank ascending by }Q_i;\quad \mathcal{C}=\{A^{(1)}\}\text{ if C1 and C2; }\{A^{(1)},A^{(2)}\}\text{ if only C2 fails; otherwise include ordered }A^{(k)}\text{ while }Q(A^{(k)})-Q(A^{(1)})<DQ

Yöntem ayrıntıları kaynak kütüphanedeki özgün (İngilizce) metindir.

Sezgi

Neutrosophic outranking/ranking - Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3). Output typically utility (higher value = preferred).

Sonucu okuma: n-vikor extends VIKOR to handle Neutrosophic uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 before ranking.

Varsayımlar

  • Decision matrix entries are valid Single-Valued Neutrosophic numbers/tuples
  • Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
  • All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale

Ne zaman kullanılmaz

  • Classical data sufficient - use base VIKOR directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
  • Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous

Sınırlılıklar

  • Rank reversal known on alternative-set changes (ref: inherited from crisp base; cf. Belton-Gear 1983, Wang-Luo 2009)
  • Assumes: Decision matrix entries are valid Single-Valued Neutrosophic numbers/tuples
  • Assumes: Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
  • Assumes: All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale

Sık yapılan hatalar

  • Değer-uzayı ihlali: hesaplamadan önce tüm girişlerin SVNS: T,I,F ∈ [0,1]; 0 ≤ T+I+F ≤ 3 koşulunu sağladığından emin olun.
  • Defuzzifikasyon yöntemi sıralamayı etkiler: score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 kanonik seçimdir.

Hesap adımları ve dayanakları

  1. SVN decision matrix; cost complement.

    Dayanak: Bausys & Zavadskas 2015, Sec.2

  2. Best and worst SVN values per criterion.

    Dayanak: Bausys & Zavadskas 2015, Sec.2 Step2

  3. Normalised neutrosophic gap ratio.

    Dayanak: Bausys & Zavadskas 2015, Sec.2 Step3

  4. Utility S_i and regret R_i measures.

    Dayanak: Bausys & Zavadskas 2015, Sec.2 Step4

  5. Compromise index Q_i; rank ascending. Check acceptability conditions.

    Dayanak: Bausys & Zavadskas 2015, Sec.2 Step5