DecisionMind Mühürlü, doğrulanabilir reprodüksiyon

Kullanım alanları

N-PROMETHEE

N-PROMETHEE - PROMETHEE yönteminin Neutrosophic uzantısı

Neutrosophic üstünlük/sıralama - Tek Değerli Nötrosofik Küme (SVNS: T, I, F)

Formül adımları

Analiz motorunun yöntem bildirimindeki (manifest F.steps) adımlar; raporlardaki formüllerle aynı kaynaktır.

  1. SVN matrix; cost complement.

    𝐃=(⟨Tij,Iij,Fij⟩);cost: apply complement ;S(A)=2+T−I−F3
    LaTeX \mathbf{D}=(\langle T_{ij},I_{ij},F_{ij}\rangle);\quad\text{cost: apply complement };\quad S(A)=\tfrac{2+T-I-F}{3}
  2. Signed neutrosophic difference for each criterion pair.

    dj(i,k)=sign(s(a~ij)−s(a~kj))·d(a~ij,a~kj);d(α1,α2)=(T1−T2)2+(I1−I2)2+(F1−F2)23
    LaTeX d_j(i,k)=\mathrm{sign}(s(\tilde{a}_{ij})-s(\tilde{a}_{kj}))\cdot d(\tilde{a}_{ij},\tilde{a}_{kj});\quad d(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)=\sqrt{\tfrac{(T_1-T_2)^2+(I_1-I_2)^2+(F_1-F_2)^2}{3}}
  3. Apply Brans–Vincke preference function (Type I usual or Type V linear).

    Pj(I)(i,k)={0dj≤01dj>0;Pj(V)(i,k)={0dj≤0dj/pj0<dj≤pj1dj>pj;π(Ai,Ak)=∑jwjPj(i,k)
    LaTeX P_j^{(I)}(i,k)=\begin{cases}0&d_j\leq 0\\1&d_j>0\end{cases};\quad P_j^{(V)}(i,k)=\begin{cases}0&d_j\leq 0\\d_j/p_j&0<d_j\leq p_j\\1&d_j>p_j\end{cases};\quad\pi(A_i,A_k)=\sum_j w_j P_j(i,k)
  4. Positive φ⁺ and negative φ⁻ outranking flows.

    ϕ+(Ai)=1m−1∑k≠iπ(Ai,Ak);ϕ−(Ai)=1m−1∑k≠iπ(Ak,Ai)
    LaTeX \phi^+(A_i)=\frac{1}{m-1}\sum_{k\neq i}\pi(A_i,A_k);\quad\phi^-(A_i)=\frac{1}{m-1}\sum_{k\neq i}\pi(A_k,A_i)
  5. Net flow PROMETHEE II; rank descending.

    ϕ(Ai)=ϕ+(Ai)−ϕ−(Ai);rank descending by ϕ(Ai)(PROMETHEE II)
    LaTeX \phi(A_i)=\phi^+(A_i)-\phi^-(A_i);\quad\text{rank descending by }\phi(A_i)\;\text{(PROMETHEE II)}

Yöntem ayrıntıları kaynak kütüphanedeki özgün (İngilizce) metindir.

Sezgi

Neutrosophic outranking/ranking - Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3). Output typically preference_flow (higher value = preferred).

Sonucu okuma: n-promethee extends PROMETHEE to handle Neutrosophic uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 before ranking.

Varsayımlar

  • Thresholds (q, p, v) can be expressed in Single-Valued Neutrosophic scale
  • Veto + concordance semantics adapted to fuzzy arithmetic

Ne zaman kullanılmaz

  • Small dataset (m<3) - outranking machinery underutilised

Sınırlılıklar

  • Rank reversal known on alternative-set changes (ref: inherited from crisp base; cf. Belton-Gear 1983, Wang-Luo 2009)
  • Assumes: Thresholds (q, p, v) can be expressed in Single-Valued Neutrosophic scale
  • Assumes: Veto + concordance semantics adapted to fuzzy arithmetic

Sık yapılan hatalar

  • Değer-uzayı ihlali: hesaplamadan önce tüm girişlerin SVNS: T,I,F ∈ [0,1]; 0 ≤ T+I+F ≤ 3 koşulunu sağladığından emin olun.
  • Defuzzifikasyon yöntemi sıralamayı etkiler: score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 kanonik seçimdir.

Hesap adımları ve dayanakları

  1. SVN matrix; cost complement.

    Dayanak: Xu, Wei, Ding, Bin 2020 (doi:10.3390/math8101816), Sec.3

  2. Signed neutrosophic difference for each criterion pair.

    Dayanak: Brans & Vincke 1985, Sec.2; Abdel-Basset et al. 2018, Sec.3 Step2

  3. Apply Brans-Vincke preference function (Type I usual or Type V linear).

    Dayanak: Brans & Vincke 1985, Sec.3

  4. Positive φ⁺ and negative φ⁻ outranking flows.

    Dayanak: Brans & Vincke 1985, Sec.4

  5. Net flow PROMETHEE II; rank descending.

    Dayanak: Brans & Vincke 1985, Sec.4 PROMETHEE II