N-CODAS
N-CODAS - CODAS yönteminin Neutrosophic uzantısı
Neutrosophic üstünlük/sıralama - Tek Değerli Nötrosofik Küme (SVNS: T, I, F)
Formül adımları
Analiz motorunun yöntem bildirimindeki (manifest F.steps) adımlar; raporlardaki formüllerle aynı kaynaktır.
-
SVN matrix; cost normalisation via complement.
LaTeX
\mathbf{D}=(\langle T_{ij},I_{ij},F_{ij}\rangle);\quad\text{cost: }\hat{a}_{ij}=\langle F_{ij},1-I_{ij},T_{ij}\rangle;\quad\text{benefit: }\hat{a}_{ij}=\tilde{a}_{ij} -
Weighted normalised SVNNs.
LaTeX
\tilde{v}_{ij}=\langle 1-(1-\hat{T}_{ij})^{w_j},\;\hat{I}_{ij}^{w_j},\;\hat{F}_{ij}^{w_j}\rangle -
Neutrosophic Negative Ideal Solution.
LaTeX
\alpha_j^-=\langle\min_i T_{ij}^v,\;\max_i I_{ij}^v,\;\max_i F_{ij}^v\rangle -
Euclidean E_i and Taxicab T_i separations from NIS.
LaTeX
d_E(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)=\sqrt{\tfrac{(T_1-T_2)^2+(I_1-I_2)^2+(F_1-F_2)^2}{3}};\quad d_H=\tfrac{|T_1-T_2|+|I_1-I_2|+|F_1-F_2|}{3};\quad E_i=\sqrt{\sum_j w_j[d_E(\tilde{v}_{ij},\alpha_j^-)]^2};\quad T_i=\sum_j w_j d_H(\tilde{v}_{ij},\alpha_j^-) -
Relative assessment matrix h_ik with threshold τ.
LaTeX
h_{ik}=(E_i-E_k)+\psi(E_i-E_k)\cdot(T_i-T_k);\quad\psi(x)=\begin{cases}1&|x|\geq\tau\\0&|x|<\tau\end{cases},\;\tau=0.02 -
Appraisal score AS_i; rank descending.
LaTeX
AS_i=\sum_{k=1}^m h_{ik};\quad\text{rank descending}
Yöntem ayrıntıları kaynak kütüphanedeki özgün (İngilizce) metindir.
Sezgi
Neutrosophic outranking/ranking - Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3). Output typically utility (higher value = preferred).
Sonucu okuma: n-codas extends CODAS to handle Neutrosophic uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 before ranking.
Varsayımlar
- Decision matrix entries are valid Single-Valued Neutrosophic numbers/tuples
- Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Ne zaman kullanılmaz
- Classical data sufficient - use base CODAS directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
- Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous
Sınırlılıklar
- Assumes: Decision matrix entries are valid Single-Valued Neutrosophic numbers/tuples
- Assumes: Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- Assumes: All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Sık yapılan hatalar
- Değer-uzayı ihlali: hesaplamadan önce tüm girişlerin SVNS: T,I,F ∈ [0,1]; 0 ≤ T+I+F ≤ 3 koşulunu sağladığından emin olun.
- Defuzzifikasyon yöntemi sıralamayı etkiler: score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 kanonik seçimdir.
Hesap adımları ve dayanakları
-
SVN matrix; cost normalisation via complement.
Dayanak: Yüksel 2020, Sec.3 Step1-2
-
Weighted normalised SVNNs.
Dayanak: Yüksel 2020, Sec.3 Step3
-
Neutrosophic Negative Ideal Solution.
Dayanak: Yüksel 2020, Sec.3 Step4
-
Euclidean E_i and Taxicab T_i separations from NIS.
Dayanak: Yüksel 2020, Sec.3 Step5
-
Relative assessment matrix h_ik with threshold τ.
Dayanak: Yüksel 2020, Sec.3 Step6
-
Appraisal score AS_i; rank descending.
Dayanak: Yüksel 2020, Sec.3 Step7-8