DecisionMind Mühürlü, doğrulanabilir reprodüksiyon

Kullanım alanları

N-CODAS

N-CODAS - CODAS yönteminin Neutrosophic uzantısı

Neutrosophic üstünlük/sıralama - Tek Değerli Nötrosofik Küme (SVNS: T, I, F)

Formül adımları

Analiz motorunun yöntem bildirimindeki (manifest F.steps) adımlar; raporlardaki formüllerle aynı kaynaktır.

  1. SVN matrix; cost normalisation via complement.

    𝐃=(⟨Tij,Iij,Fij⟩);cost: a^ij=⟨Fij,1−Iij,Tij⟩;benefit: a^ij=a~ij
    LaTeX \mathbf{D}=(\langle T_{ij},I_{ij},F_{ij}\rangle);\quad\text{cost: }\hat{a}_{ij}=\langle F_{ij},1-I_{ij},T_{ij}\rangle;\quad\text{benefit: }\hat{a}_{ij}=\tilde{a}_{ij}
  2. Weighted normalised SVNNs.

    v~ij=⟨1−(1−T^ij)wj,I^ijwj,F^ijwj⟩
    LaTeX \tilde{v}_{ij}=\langle 1-(1-\hat{T}_{ij})^{w_j},\;\hat{I}_{ij}^{w_j},\;\hat{F}_{ij}^{w_j}\rangle
  3. Neutrosophic Negative Ideal Solution.

    αj−=⟨miniTijv,maxiIijv,maxiFijv⟩
    LaTeX \alpha_j^-=\langle\min_i T_{ij}^v,\;\max_i I_{ij}^v,\;\max_i F_{ij}^v\rangle
  4. Euclidean E_i and Taxicab T_i separations from NIS.

    dE(α1,α2)=(T1−T2)2+(I1−I2)2+(F1−F2)23;dH=|T1−T2|+|I1−I2|+|F1−F2|3;Ei=∑jwj[dE(v~ij,αj−)]2;Ti=∑jwjdH(v~ij,αj−)
    LaTeX d_E(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)=\sqrt{\tfrac{(T_1-T_2)^2+(I_1-I_2)^2+(F_1-F_2)^2}{3}};\quad d_H=\tfrac{|T_1-T_2|+|I_1-I_2|+|F_1-F_2|}{3};\quad E_i=\sqrt{\sum_j w_j[d_E(\tilde{v}_{ij},\alpha_j^-)]^2};\quad T_i=\sum_j w_j d_H(\tilde{v}_{ij},\alpha_j^-)
  5. Relative assessment matrix h_ik with threshold τ.

    hik=(Ei−Ek)+ψ(Ei−Ek)·(Ti−Tk);ψ(x)={1|x|≥τ0|x|<τ,τ=0.02
    LaTeX h_{ik}=(E_i-E_k)+\psi(E_i-E_k)\cdot(T_i-T_k);\quad\psi(x)=\begin{cases}1&|x|\geq\tau\\0&|x|<\tau\end{cases},\;\tau=0.02
  6. Appraisal score AS_i; rank descending.

    ASi=∑k=1mhik;rank descending
    LaTeX AS_i=\sum_{k=1}^m h_{ik};\quad\text{rank descending}

Yöntem ayrıntıları kaynak kütüphanedeki özgün (İngilizce) metindir.

Sezgi

Neutrosophic outranking/ranking - Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3). Output typically utility (higher value = preferred).

Sonucu okuma: n-codas extends CODAS to handle Neutrosophic uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 before ranking.

Varsayımlar

  • Decision matrix entries are valid Single-Valued Neutrosophic numbers/tuples
  • Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
  • All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale

Ne zaman kullanılmaz

  • Classical data sufficient - use base CODAS directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
  • Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous

Sınırlılıklar

  • Assumes: Decision matrix entries are valid Single-Valued Neutrosophic numbers/tuples
  • Assumes: Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
  • Assumes: All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale

Sık yapılan hatalar

  • Değer-uzayı ihlali: hesaplamadan önce tüm girişlerin SVNS: T,I,F ∈ [0,1]; 0 ≤ T+I+F ≤ 3 koşulunu sağladığından emin olun.
  • Defuzzifikasyon yöntemi sıralamayı etkiler: score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 kanonik seçimdir.

Hesap adımları ve dayanakları

  1. SVN matrix; cost normalisation via complement.

    Dayanak: Yüksel 2020, Sec.3 Step1-2

  2. Weighted normalised SVNNs.

    Dayanak: Yüksel 2020, Sec.3 Step3

  3. Neutrosophic Negative Ideal Solution.

    Dayanak: Yüksel 2020, Sec.3 Step4

  4. Euclidean E_i and Taxicab T_i separations from NIS.

    Dayanak: Yüksel 2020, Sec.3 Step5

  5. Relative assessment matrix h_ik with threshold τ.

    Dayanak: Yüksel 2020, Sec.3 Step6

  6. Appraisal score AS_i; rank descending.

    Dayanak: Yüksel 2020, Sec.3 Step7-8