HELLWIG
Hellwig Yöntemi - Gelişim Deseni
İdeale taksonomik mesafe (gelişmişlik ölçüsü)
Formül adımları
Analiz motorunun yöntem bildirimindeki (manifest F.steps) adımlar; raporlardaki formüllerle aynı kaynaktır.
-
Adım 1 — Standartlaştırma z_ij.
LaTeX
z_{ij} = \dfrac{x_{ij}-\mu_{j}}{\sigma_{j}} -
Adım 2 — Referans örüntü z_0.
LaTeX
z_{0j}=\max_{i} z_{ij}\ (J^{+})\ \text{or}\ \min_{i} z_{ij}\ (J^{-}) -
Adım 3 — Referanstan Öklid uzaklığı.
LaTeX
d_{i0} = \sqrt{\sum_{j=1}^{n}(z_{ij}-z_{0j})^{2}} -
Adım 4 — Hellwig ölçüsü h_i.
LaTeX
h_{i} = 1 - \dfrac{d_{i0}}{d_{0}},\quad d_{0} = \bar{d} + 2\sigma_{d}
Yöntem ayrıntıları kaynak kütüphanedeki özgün (İngilizce) metindir.
Sezgi
Taxonomic distance-from-ideal (development measure). Output typically utility (higher value = preferred).
Sonucu okuma: m_i ∈ (−∞,1]. Higher m means closer to the ideal pattern. m_i close to 1 = excellent development level. m_i < 0 means the alternative is farther from ideal than the critical distance d⁰. Hellwig's method is weight-free by design - all criteria are treated equally. It is widely used in regional/country development studies.
Varsayımlar
- Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
Ne zaman kullanılmaz
- Criteria strongly correlated → consider DEMATEL/ANP for interdependence
- Non-compensatory preferences → consider outranking (ELECTRE/PROMETHEE)
Sınırlılıklar
- Assumes: Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- Assumes: Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- Assumes: Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
Sık yapılan hatalar
- Sabit sütun: standart sapma = 0, z-skor tanımsız - E-2'yi kontrol edin.
Hesap adımları ve dayanakları
-
Standardise each criterion: z_ij = (x_ij − μ_j)/σ_j.
Dayanak: Hellwig 1968, p.310 Eq.(1)
-
Reference pattern z_0j = max z_ij (benefit) or min (cost).
Dayanak: Hellwig 1968, p.310 Eq.(2)
-
Euclidean distance from reference: d_i = √Σ (z_ij − z_0j)².
Dayanak: Hellwig 1968, p.310 Eq.(3)
-
Hellwig measure h_i = 1 − d_i/d_0; d_0 = μ_d + 2σ_d; descending ranking.
Dayanak: Hellwig 1968, p.311 Eq.(4)