FUZZY-AROMAN
Fuzzy AROMAN - AROMAN yönteminin Fuzzy uzantısı
Fuzzy üstünlük/sıralama - Üçgen Bulanık Sayı (TBS: l, m, u)
Formül adımları
Analiz motorunun yöntem bildirimindeki (manifest F.steps) adımlar; raporlardaki formüllerle aynı kaynaktır.
-
TFN karar matrisi X̃=[x̃ij] ve ağırlık vektörü w̃j=(wjα,wjβ,wjγ)'yi çıkar.
LaTeX
X̃=[x̃_{ij}]=(x_{ij}^{\alpha},x_{ij}^{\beta},x_{ij}^{\gamma});\quad\tilde{w}_j=(w_j^{\alpha},w_j^{\beta},w_j^{\gamma}) -
İki-adım normalizasyon: lineer (Eq.2) + vektör (Eq.3), sonra agrege ortalama (Eq.4) t^norm=(β·lin+(1-β)·vec)/2, β=0.5. TFN bileşen-bazlı.
LaTeX
\text{COA}(\tilde{x}_{ij})=\frac{x_{ij}^{\alpha}+x_{ij}^{\beta}+x_{ij}^{\gamma}}{3};\quad d_{ij}^{\text{norm}}=\frac{\text{COA}(\tilde{x}_{ij})}{\sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^{m}\text{COA}(\tilde{x}_{ij})^2}};\quad \tilde{d}_{ij}=\tilde{x}_{ij}\,/\,\sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^{m}\text{COA}(\tilde{x}_{ij})^2} -
Ağırlıklı normalize matris (Eq.5): t̂ij = w̃j ⊗ t^norm_ij.
LaTeX
\tilde{r}_{ij}=\begin{cases}\tilde{d}_{ij}\,/\,\max_i\text{COA}(\tilde{d}_{ij}) & \text{benefit}\\\min_i\text{COA}(\tilde{d}_{ij})\,/\,\tilde{d}_{ij} & \text{cost}\end{cases} -
Yön ayrımı (Eq.6/7): Li=Σ min-tip, Ai=Σ max-tip (COA); λ-güç (Eq.8/9): L^=Li^λ, A^=Ai^(1-λ), λ=0.5.
LaTeX
\tilde{v}_{ij}=\tilde{r}_{ij}\otimes\tilde{w}_j=(r_{ij}^{\alpha}w_j^{\alpha},\,r_{ij}^{\beta}w_j^{\beta},\,r_{ij}^{\gamma}w_j^{\gamma}) -
Final sıralama (Eq.10): Ri = exp(A^ − L^); azalan sıra.
LaTeX
Q_i=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\text{COA}(\tilde{v}_{ij})=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\frac{v_{ij}^{\alpha}+v_{ij}^{\beta}+v_{ij}^{\gamma}}{3};\quad\text{rank descending by }Q_i
Yöntem ayrıntıları kaynak kütüphanedeki özgün (İngilizce) metindir.
Sezgi
Fuzzy outranking/ranking - Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u). Output typically utility (higher value = preferred).
Sonucu okuma: fuzzy-aroman extends AROMAN to handle Fuzzy uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via centroid (l+m+u)/3 before ranking.
Varsayımlar
- Decision matrix entries are valid Fuzzy (Triangular) numbers/tuples
- Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Ne zaman kullanılmaz
- Classical data sufficient - use base AROMAN directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
- Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous
Sınırlılıklar
- Assumes: Decision matrix entries are valid Fuzzy (Triangular) numbers/tuples
- Assumes: Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- Assumes: All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Sık yapılan hatalar
- Değer-uzayı ihlali: hesaplamadan önce tüm girişlerin TFN: l ≤ m ≤ u ve tümü ≥ 0 koşulunu sağladığından emin olun.
- Defuzzifikasyon yöntemi sıralamayı etkiler: centroid (l+m+u)/3 kanonik seçimdir.
Hesap adımları ve dayanakları
-
Extract TFN decision matrix X̃=[x̃ij] and weights w̃j=(wjα,wjβ,wjγ).
-
Vector (Euclidean) normalisation per column using COA defuzzified values: d̃ij = x̃ij / sqrt(Σi COA(x̃ij)²).
-
Min-max normalisation on vector-normalised TFNs: benefit r̃ij = d̃ij / max_i COA(d̃ij); cost r̃ij = min_i COA(d̃ij) / d̃ij.
-
Weighted TFN product: ṽij = r̃ij ⊗ w̃j = (rijα·wjα, rijβ·wjβ, rijγ·wjγ).
-
Compute AROMAN score Qi = Σj COA(ṽij) and rank alternatives in descending order; highest Qi is best.